Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv00222
Filed: May 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2023 Filing 21 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Kristina McKenna on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9600886. (McKenna, Kristina)
July 12, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Kate Mullins on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc. (Mullins, Sarah)
July 12, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Diana Marie Rutowski on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc. (Rutowski, Diana)
July 12, 2023 Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeremy Jason Lang on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc. (Lang, Jeremy)
July 12, 2023 Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jared B Bobrow on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc. (Bobrow, Jared)
July 10, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy W Riffe on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Riffe, Timothy)
July 7, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-2 Disclosures) (Hill, Jack Wesley)
July 7, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Linhong Zhang on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Zhang, Linhong)
July 7, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ruffin B Cordell on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Cordell, Ruffin)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 7/20/2023 at 9:30 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/15/23. (tkd, )
May 24, 2023 Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cisco Systems, Inc..( Smith, Melissa)
May 24, 2023 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cisco Systems, Inc. to 7/27/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
May 22, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jason Zucchi on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9511414. (Zucchi, Jason)
May 19, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph V Colaianni, Jr on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Colaianni, Joseph)
May 19, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam R Shartzer on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Shartzer, Adam)
May 19, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Cisco Systems, Inc.. (ch, )
May 19, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Garrett C. Parish on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Parish, Garrett)
May 19, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Fair, Andrea)
May 19, 2023 Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.. (Hill, Jack Wesley)
May 19, 2023 Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Hong Kong Technologies Group Limited for Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.. (Hill, Jack Wesley)
May 19, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hill, Jack Wesley)
May 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cisco Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9508714.), filed by Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Hill, Jack Wesley)
May 19, 2023 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
May 19, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.
Represented By: Adam R Shartzer
Represented By: Andrea Leigh Fair
Represented By: Garrett C. Parish
Represented By: Joseph V Colaianni, Jr
Represented By: Jack Wesley Hill
Represented By: Ruffin B Cordell
Represented By: Jason Zucchi
Represented By: Linhong Zhang
Represented By: Timothy W Riffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Jared B Bobrow
Represented By: Diana Marie Rutowski
Represented By: Jeremy Jason Lang
Represented By: Kristina McKenna
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Represented By: Sarah Kate Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?