Willow Innovations, Inc. v. Chiaro Technology, Ltd.
| Willow Innovations, Inc. |
| Chiaro Technology, Ltd. d/b/a Elvie |
| 2:2023cv00229 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Chiaro Technology, Ltd. to 8/12/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Chiaro Technology, Ltd..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Willow Innovations, Inc. re #11 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Willow's Notice of Compliance with the Court's Order Authorizing Service by Mail under Rule 4(f)(2)(C)(ii)) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cason G. Cole, #2 Exhibit A)(Durst, Timothy) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Robert F Shaffer on behalf of Willow Innovations, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9527966. (Shaffer, Robert) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 05/28/2023. (klc, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Service of Process by Mail by Willow Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Durst, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jason Fountain on behalf of Willow Innovations, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9518763. (Fountain, Jason) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Carolyn Wall on behalf of Willow Innovations, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9518743. (Wall, Carolyn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cason Garrett Cole on behalf of Willow Innovations, Inc. (Cole, Cason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Laura M Burson on behalf of Willow Innovations, Inc. (Burson, Laura) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Chiaro Technology, Ltd.. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Durst, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Willow Innovations, Inc.. (Durst, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Willow Innovations, Inc. (Durst, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Chiaro Technology, Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9517394.), filed by Willow Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Civil Cover Sheet)(Durst, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
