Minotaur Systems LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
| Minotaur Systems LLC |
| AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Services, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00344 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Scheduling/Case Management Conference originally set for 12/4/2023 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap has been CANCELLED (refer to Dkt. No. 13) (aeb) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 JOINT MOTION to Stay all Deadlines and Notice of Resolution. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/6/2023. (ch, )
|
| Filing 12 JOINT MOTION to Stay all Deadlines and Notice of Resolution by Minotaur Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rubino, John) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER - Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 12/4/2023 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/2/2023. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services, Inc..( Dacus, Deron) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Services, Inc. to 11/6/2023; AT&T Mobility LLC to 11/6/2023; AT&T Inc. to 11/6/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Minotaur Systems LLC. AT&T Services, Inc. served on 8/31/2023, answer due 9/21/2023. (Rubino, John) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Minotaur Systems LLC. AT&T Mobility LLC served on 8/31/2023, answer due 9/21/2023. (Rubino, John) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Minotaur Systems LLC. AT&T Inc. served on 8/31/2023, answer due 9/21/2023. (Rubino, John) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s))(nkl, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Mondelli, III on behalf of Minotaur Systems LLC (Mondelli, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Andrew Rubino on behalf of Minotaur Systems LLC (Rubino, John) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Minotaur Systems LLC (Rubino, John) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rubino, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9614279.), filed by Minotaur Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rubino, John) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
