INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MABLE SIMPSON v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
JEANETTE ROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MABLE SIMPSON |
U.S. Bank, N.A. |
2:2023cv00355 |
August 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
12 U.S.C. ยง 191 Bank Foreclosure |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Gray, Travis) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE by U.S. Bank, N.A. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gray, Travis) |
Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent U.S. Bancorp for U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Gray, Travis) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Appendix A, #7 Proposed Order ORDER)(Gray, Travis) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Travis Gray on behalf of U.S. Bank, N.A. (Gray, Travis) |
Filing 3 FIRST ORIGINAL ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (filed in 115th Judicail District Upshur County Cause No. 403-22)(ch, ) |
Filing 2 ORIGINAL THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against U.S. Bank, N.A., filed by JEANETTE ROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MABLE SIMPSON. (filed in 115th Judicial District Upshur County Texas Cause No 403-22)(ch, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by U.S. Bank, N.A. from 115TH DISTRICT COURT, UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS, case number 403-22. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9627621), filed by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Ferguson, Christopher) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MABLE SIMPSON v. U.S. Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JEANETTE ROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MABLE SIMPSON | |
Represented By: | Matthew Robert Patton, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Travis Gray |
Represented By: | Christopher Ferguson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.