TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
| TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
| CVS HEALTH CORPORATION and CVS PHARMACY, INC. |
| 2:2023cv00413 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
CONSOLIDATION ORDER -The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00412. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial., Cases associated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/2/2023. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. CVS PHARMACY, INC. served on 9/22/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION served on 9/22/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CVS PHARMACY, INC..( Gills, Jeanne) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CVS HEALTH CORPORATION.( Gills, Jeanne) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CVS HEALTH CORPORATION to 11/13/2023. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CVS PHARMACY, INC. to 11/13/2023. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Mark Sobaje on behalf of CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC. (Sobaje, Justin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeanne M Gills on behalf of CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC. (Gills, Jeanne) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hurt, Christian) |
| Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Hurt, Christian) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s))(klc, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian J Hurt on behalf of TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Hurt, Christian) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9705510.), filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
