Deepwell IP LLC v. MediaTek Inc.
Deepwell IP LLC |
MediaTek Inc. |
2:2023cv00429 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Kurt Truelove on behalf of Deepwell IP LLC (Truelove, Justin) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for Service of Process on Defendant MediaTek Inc.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/27/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of Deepwell IP LLC (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of Deepwell IP LLC (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for Service of Process on Defendant MediaTek Inc. by Deepwell IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Request for Judicial Assistance, #2 Proposed Order)(Rubino, Vincent) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Michael Mercadante on behalf of Deepwell IP LLC (Mercadante, Joseph) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to MediaTek Inc.. (nkl, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of Deepwell IP LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Deepwell IP LLC identifying Corporate Parent Quest Patent Research Corporation for Deepwell IP LLC. (Rubino, Vincent) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rubino, Vincent) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against MediaTek Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9712399.), filed by Deepwell IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rubino, Vincent) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Deepwell IP LLC v. MediaTek Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deepwell IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Vincent J Rubino, III |
Represented By: | Alfred Ross Fabricant |
Represented By: | Joseph Michael Mercadante |
Represented By: | Justin Kurt Truelove |
Represented By: | Peter Lambrianakos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MediaTek Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.