Aspen Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Inc. et al
| Aspen Networks, Inc. |
| AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC |
| 2:2023cv00476 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Roy S Payne |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER DISMISSING as to AT&T Inc. only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/8/2023. (nkl, ) Modified on 12/8/2023 (nkl, ).
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Aspen Networks, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice regarding AT&T Inc. Only))(Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Nathanial Powers on behalf of AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC (Powers, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kevin Hess on behalf of AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC (Hess, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nicholas M Mathews on behalf of AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC (Mathews, Nicholas) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Beverina on behalf of Aspen Networks, Inc. (Beverina, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC.( Dacus, Deron) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Mobility, LLC to 12/18/2023; AT&T Inc. to 12/18/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Fabio Elia Marino on behalf of Aspen Networks, Inc. (Marino, Fabio) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aspen Networks, Inc.. AT&T Inc. served on 10/13/2023. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aspen Networks, Inc.. AT&T Mobility, LLC served on 10/13/2023. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to AT&T Inc. C T Corporation System, AT&T Mobility, LLC C T Corporation System. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s))(nkl, ) |
| Filing 5 Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Aspen Networks, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent None for Aspen Networks, Inc.. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Aspen Networks, Inc.. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9749187.), filed by Aspen Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 8,009,554, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Findlay, Eric) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
