Innovative Sonic Limited et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
| Innovative Sonic Limited and Celerity IP, LLC |
| AT&T Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility II LLC and AT&T Services Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00489 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00490. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/13/2023. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP, LLC. AT&T Services Inc. served on 10/19/2023. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP, LLC. AT&T Mobility LLC served on 10/19/2023. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP, LLC. AT&T Mobility II LLC served on 10/19/2023. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP, LLC. AT&T Inc. served on 10/19/2023. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP, LLC. AT&T Corp. served on 10/19/2023. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility II LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services Inc..( Dacus, Deron) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Mobility II LLC to 12/26/2023; AT&T Corp. to 12/26/2023; AT&T Inc. to 12/26/2023; AT&T Services Inc. to 12/26/2023; AT&T Mobility LLC to 12/26/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility II LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s), #3 Additional Attachment(s), #4 Additional Attachment(s))(ch, ) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Celerity IP, LLC, Innovative Sonic Limited identifying Corporate Parent Centreville SPV, LLC for Celerity IP, LLC. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bunt, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility II LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9766202.), filed by Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Bunt, Robert) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
