Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. ByteDance Ltd. et al
| Cellspin Soft, Inc. |
| ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Pte. Ltd and TikTok Pte. Ltd. |
| 2:2023cv00496 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adil A. Shaikh on behalf of ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Pte. Ltd, TikTok Pte. Ltd. (Shaikh, Adil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Noel Franco Chakkalakal on behalf of ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Pte. Ltd, TikTok Pte. Ltd. (Chakkalakal, Noel) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David Brandon Conrad on behalf of ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Pte. Ltd, TikTok Pte. Ltd. (Conrad, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ricardo Joel Bonilla on behalf of ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Pte. Ltd, TikTok Pte. Ltd. (Bonilla, Ricardo) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cellspin Soft, Inc.. ByteDance Ltd. waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 2/29/2024; ByteDance Pte. Ltd waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 2/29/2024; TikTok Pte. Ltd. waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 2/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Waiver, #2 Waiver)(Fuller, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cellspin Soft, Inc.. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Pte. Ltd, TikTok Pte. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s))(ch, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Cellspin Soft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Claim Charts, #3 Exhibit 2 - Claim Charts, #4 Exhibit 3 - Claim Charts, #5 Exhibit 4 - Claim Charts, #6 Exhibit 5 - Claim Charts, #7 Exhibit 6 - Claim Charts, #8 Exhibit 7 - Claim Charts, #9 Exhibit 8 - screenshot, #10 Exhibit 9 - Google Patents listing, #11 Exhibit 10 - TikTok's Terms of Service, #12 Exhibit 11 - article, #13 Exhibit 12 - article, #14 Exhibit 13 - Collin County Property Search, #15 Exhibit 14 - article on Texas Data Centers, #16 Exhibit 15 - Introducing TikTok Shop, #17 Exhibit 16 - TikTok confirms it is using Oracle infrastructure in the US, #18 Exhibit 17 - TikTok tells employees to return to office, #19 Exhibit 18 - ZDNet article, #20 Exhibit 19 - article, #21 Exhibit 20 - TikTok Getting into Ecommerce, #22 Exhibit 21 - TikTok on App Store, #23 Exhibit 22 - About Project Texas)(Garteiser, Randall) Modified on 10/23/2023 (nkl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
