Pay As You Go, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Pay As You Go, LLC |
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
2:2023cv00501 |
October 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00462. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial., Cases associated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/13/2023. (nkl, ) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pay As You Go, LLC. T-Mobile USA, Inc. served on 10/27/2023. (McPhail, Donald) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile USA, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 1/6/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (ch, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Donald R McPhail on behalf of Pay As You Go, LLC (McPhail, Donald) |
Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Pay As You Go, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Patent Asset Management, LLC for Pay As You Go, LLC. (McPhail, Donald) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (McPhail, Donald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against T-Mobile USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9778376.), filed by Pay As You Go, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McPhail, Donald) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pay As You Go, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pay As You Go, LLC | |
Represented By: | Donald R McPhail |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Melissa Richards Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.