Stack NFT LLC v. NEAR Stiftung (NEAR Foundation)
Plaintiff: Stack NFT LLC
Defendant: NEAR Stiftung (NEAR Foundation)
Case Number: 2:2023cv00512
Filed: November 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Roy S Payne
Referring Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to File Complaint under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/17/2023. (ch, )
December 14, 2023 Filing 8 SECOND NOTICE by Stack NFT LLC re #6 Notice (Other), #1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint Under Seal (Notice of Updated Certificate of Conference) (Everingham, Charles)
November 16, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Erick M. Sandler on behalf of Stack NFT LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9822773. (Sandler, Erick)
November 15, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE by Stack NFT LLC re #1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint Under Seal - (Notice of Updated Certificate of Conference) (Everingham, Charles)
November 14, 2023 Filing 5 REDACTION to #2 Sealed Document by Stack NFT LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (sealed in entirety), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Everingham, Charles)
November 7, 2023 Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) AND (2) Disclosure Statement filed by Stack NFT LLC identifying Other Affiliate Blue Star Sports Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Spay, Inc., Other Affiliate Stack Sports Holdings, L.P. for Stack NFT LLC. (Everingham, Charles)
November 7, 2023 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Stack NFT LLC. (Everingham, Charles)
November 7, 2023 Filing 2 Sealed Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Everingham, Charles)
November 7, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint Under Seal by Stack NFT LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Everingham, Charles)
November 7, 2023 Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, )
November 7, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stack NFT LLC v. NEAR Stiftung (NEAR Foundation)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stack NFT LLC
Represented By: Charles Everingham, IV
Represented By: Erick M. Sandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEAR Stiftung (NEAR Foundation)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?