RecepTrexx LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.
| RecepTrexx LLC |
| Fortinet, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00519 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2024 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap has been CANCELLED (refer to Dkt. No. 9). (aeb) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/19/2023. (ch, )
|
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement by RecepTrexx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2024 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/13/2023. (ch, )
|
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re RecepTrexx LLC.( Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Fortinet, Inc. to 1/10/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Fortinet, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by RecepTrexx LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Phillip Rabicoff on behalf of RecepTrexx LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Fortinet, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9814003.), filed by RecepTrexx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RecepTrexx LLC v. Fortinet, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RecepTrexx LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Phillip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fortinet, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
