DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
| DigiMedia Tech, LLC |
| Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Best Buy Health, Inc., Best Buy Texas.com, LLC and BestBuy.Com, LLC. |
| 2:2023cv00530 |
| November 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Roy S Payne |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for BestBuy.Com, LLC. to 2/1/2024; Best Buy Health, Inc. to 2/1/2024; Best Buy Stores, L.P. to 2/1/2024; Best Buy Co., Inc. to 2/1/2024; Best Buy Texas.com, LLC to 2/1/2024. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re DigiMedia Tech, LLC.( Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re DigiMedia Tech, LLC.( Alexander, Cortney) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for BestBuy.Com, LLC. to 1/17/2024; Best Buy Health, Inc. to 1/17/2024; Best Buy Stores, L.P. to 1/17/2024; Best Buy Co., Inc. to 1/17/2024; Best Buy Texas.com, LLC to 1/17/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Best Buy Co., Inc. c/o C T Corporation System (reg'd agent), Best Buy Health, Inc. c/o C T Corporation System (reg'd agent), Best Buy Stores, L.P. c/o C T Corporation System (reg'd agent), Best Buy Texas.com, LLC c/o C T Corporation System (reg'd agent), BestBuy.Com, LLC. c/o C T Corporation System (reg'd agent). (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s), #3 Additional Attachment(s), #4 Additional Attachment(s))(nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9826731.), filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 8,160,980, #2 Exhibit A-1 - Declaration of David Lett, #3 Exhibit B - US Patent No. 6,606,287, #4 Exhibit C - US Patent No. 7,715,476, #5 Exhibit D - US Patent No. 6,684,220, #6 Exhibit E - Claim Chart for USP 8,160,980, #7 Exhibit F - Claim Chart for USP 6,606,287, #8 Exhibit G - Claim Chart for USP 7,715,476, #9 Exhibit H - Claim Chart for USP 6,684,220, #10 Exhibit I - Best Buy Health Website, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, Cortney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
