Better Browsing LLC v. Acer Inc.
Plaintiff: Better Browsing LLC
Defendant: Acer Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv00567
Filed: December 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2024 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Better Browsing LLC. Acer Inc. waiver sent on 1/15/2024, answer due 4/15/2024. (Rozier, Carey)
December 6, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Acer Inc.. (ch, )
December 6, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Francis McDonough, III on behalf of Better Browsing LLC (McDonough, James)
December 6, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Lloyd Hardt on behalf of Better Browsing LLC (Hardt, Jonathan)
December 6, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rozier, Carey)
December 6, 2023 Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Better Browsing LLC (Rozier, Carey)
December 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Acer Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9855508.), filed by Better Browsing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Proposed Summons)(Rozier, Carey)
December 6, 2023 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, )
December 6, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Better Browsing LLC v. Acer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Better Browsing LLC
Represented By: James Francis McDonough, III
Represented By: Jonathan Lloyd Hardt
Represented By: Carey Matthew Rozier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?