GibCode Technologies LLC v. Kroger Co.
GibCode Technologies LLC |
Kroger Co. |
2:2023cv00581 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kroger Co..( Atkins, William) |
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kroger Co. to 2/15/2024. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William P. Atkins on behalf of Kroger Co. (Atkins, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GibCode Technologies LLC. Kroger Co. served on 12/11/2023. (Miller, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan R Miller on behalf of GibCode Technologies LLC (Miller, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kroger Co..( Atkins, William) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kroger Co. to 2/1/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Kroger Co. c/o Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Inco. (nkl, ) |
Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by GibCode Technologies LLC (Lynch, Travis) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Lynch, Travis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Kroger Co. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BTXEDC-9859975.), filed by GibCode Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 8,521,649, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lynch, Travis) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GibCode Technologies LLC v. Kroger Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GibCode Technologies LLC | |
Represented By: | Travis E. Lynch |
Represented By: | Jonathan R Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kroger Co. | |
Represented By: | William P. Atkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.