RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems IP, LLC
Plaintiff: RingCentral, Inc
Defendant: Estech Systems IP, LLC
Case Number: 2:2023mc00001
Filed: February 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Hugh Findlay on behalf of RingCentral, Inc (Findlay, Eric)
February 16, 2023 Filing 17 Case transferred in from District of California Northern; Case Number 4:22-mc-80295. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
February 16, 2023 Case transferred to the Eastern District of Texas. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
February 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #8 Motion to Transfer Case in case 4:22-mc-80295-KAW. Associated Cases: 4:22-mc-80295-KAW, 4:22-mc-80296-KAW(wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
December 19, 2022 Filing 15 REPLY (re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case ) filed byEstech Systems IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Fred I. Williams, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Williams, Fred) (Filed on 12/19/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
December 12, 2022 Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case ) filed byRingCentral, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jingyuan Luo in Support)(Roberts, Clement) (Filed on 12/12/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER requiring Chambers Copy re: #8 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC. The Court did not receive a chambers copy of this document. The filing party shall lodge a copy of all documents and tabbed exhibits, if applicable, within three days of this order. Additionally, the parties shall lodge all related briefing in accordance with the Court's Standing Order. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/8/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TERMINATING MOTION TO QUASH re #4 , Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Related Case Order re: #5 , Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
December 2, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to RingCentral, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Estech Systems IP, LLC's Subpoena by RingCentral, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Roberts, Clement) (Filed on 12/2/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Fred I. Williams. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 28, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC. Responses due by 12/12/2022. Replies due by 12/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Fred I. Williams, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order)(McMasters, Thomas) (Filed on 11/28/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 28, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to RingCentral, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Estech Systems IP, LLC's Subpoena filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Lea Brigtsen, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order)(McMasters, Thomas) (Filed on 11/28/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 28, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17759933.) filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Williams, Fred) (Filed on 11/28/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 8, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Relate Case RingCentral, Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12 filed by RingCentral, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Jingyuan Luo in Support of RingCentral, Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting RingCentral, Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service by Electronic and Hand Delivery)(Roberts, Clement) (Filed on 11/8/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 4, 2022 Filing 4 **CORRECTION OF DOCKET #1 ** MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA Corrected - RingCentral, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Estech Systems IP, LLC's Subpoena filed by RingCentral, Inc. Responses due by 11/18/2022. Replies due by 11/25/2022. (Roberts, Clement) (Filed on 11/4/2022) Modified on 11/4/2022 (jlg, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER requiring Chambers Copies and electronic copies re: #1 . The filing party shall lodge a copy of all documents and tabbed exhibits within three days of this order. The filing party shall also email Word (.docx) versions of their moving papers to kawpo@cand.uscourts.gov on or before 11/7/2022. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/3/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 2, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2022) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]
November 2, 2022 Filing 1 ***DOCUMENT CORRECTED. PLEASE SEE DOCKET #4*** MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA RingCentral, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Estech Systems IP, LLC's Subpoena against Estech Systems IP, LLC (Filing fee $49, receipt number ACANDC-17692399). Filed by RingCentral, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jingyuan Luo in Support of RingCentral, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Estsech Systems IP, LLC's Subpoena, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting RingCentral, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Estech Systems IP, LLC's Subpoena)(Roberts, Clement) (Filed on 11/2/2022) Modified on 11/4/2022 (ecg, COURT STAFF). Modified on 11/4/2022 (jlg, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 2/16/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems IP, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RingCentral, Inc
Represented By: Clement S Roberts
Represented By: Eric Hugh Findlay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estech Systems IP, LLC
Represented By: Fred I. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?