Procomm International Pte. Ltd. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Procomm International Pte. Ltd. |
Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson, Inc. |
2:2024cv00009 |
January 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Roy S Payne |
Robert W Schroeder |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement, #9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson answer due 4/29/2024; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless answer due 4/29/2024; Verizon Communications, Inc. answer due 4/29/2024; Ericsson, Inc. answer due 4/29/2024; granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement, #9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson answer due 4/29/2024; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless answer due 4/29/2024; Verizon Communications, Inc. answer due 4/29/2024; Ericsson, Inc. answer due 4/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/2/2024. (ch, ) |
Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement by Ericsson, Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Procomm International Pte. Ltd.. Ericsson, Inc. served on 1/9/2024. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Procomm International Pte. Ltd.. Verizon Communications, Inc. served on 1/9/2024. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Procomm International Pte. Ltd.. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless served on 1/9/2024. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Procomm International Pte. Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Hong Kong Technologies Group Limited for Procomm International Pte. Ltd.. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Ericsson, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s))(ch, ) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Ericsson, Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Verizon Communications, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9906373.), filed by Procomm International Pte. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Bunt, Robert) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.