Mobile Health Innovative Solutions, LLC v. Apple Inc.
| Mobile Health Innovative Solutions, LLC |
| Apple Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00014 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Steven Horn on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9993704. (Horn, Steven) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Courtney C. Merrill on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9990807. (Merrill, Courtney) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jungyeon Kim on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9990801. (Kim, Jungyeon) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Vikram Iyer on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9990789. (Iyer, Vikram) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Joseph F Haag on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9990322. (Haag, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Sarah B Petty on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9990048. (Petty, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Mark D. Selwyn on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9989990. (Selwyn, Mark) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Sarah R. Frazier on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9989568. (Frazier, Sarah) |
Filing 6
ORDER - Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 3/25/2024 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/14/2024. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mobile Health Innovative Solutions, LLC. Apple Inc. served on 1/25/2024. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 3/18/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Apple Inc.. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9912700.), filed by Mobile Health Innovative Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Patent, #3 Exhibit B - Patent)(Garteiser, Randall) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
