Display Technologies, LLC v. Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd.
| Display Technologies, LLC |
| Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. |
| 2:2024cv00046 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(5) by Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Ghavimi, Darlene) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd..( Ghavimi, Darlene) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Darlene Fae Ghavimi on behalf of Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. (Ghavimi, Darlene) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. to 3/21/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Display Technologies, LLC. Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. served on 1/29/2024. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd.. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9941299.), filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garteiser, Randall) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Display Technologies, LLC v. Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Display Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Randall T Garteiser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Darlene Fae Ghavimi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
