US Conec, LTD. v. Senko Advance Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: US Conec, LTD.
Defendant: Senko Advance Co., Ltd., EZconn Corp., Flexoptix GmbH, Changzhou Co-Net Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen UnitekFiber Solution Ltd., Shenzhen IH Optics Co., Ltd., Rayoptic Communication Co., Ltd. and HuNan Surfiber Technology Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 2:2024cv00202
Filed: March 20, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Roy S Payne
Referring Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2024 Filing 16 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Changzhou Co-Net Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., EZconn Corp., HuNan Surfiber Technology Co., Ltd., Rayoptic Communication Co., Ltd., Senko Advance Co., Ltd., Shenzhen IH Optics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen UnitekFiber Solution Ltd. (Robinowitz, Kevin)
May 16, 2024 Filing 15 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay by Changzhou Co-Net Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., EZconn Corp., HuNan Surfiber Technology Co., Ltd., Rayoptic Communication Co., Ltd., Senko Advance Co., Ltd., Shenzhen IH Optics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen UnitekFiber Solution Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit ITC Notice)(Robinowitz, Kevin)
May 2, 2024 Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by US Conec, LTD.. EZconn Corp. waiver sent on 4/5/2024, answer due 7/5/2024. (Bradley, Kirk)
April 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/9/2024. (NKL)
April 8, 2024 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by US Conec, LTD.. Senko Advance Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 4/3/2024, answer due 6/3/2024. (Bradley, Kirk)
April 8, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Kirk T Bradley on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Bradley, Kirk)
April 8, 2024 Filing 10 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by US Conec, LTD. identifying Corporate Parent Corning Optical Communications, LLC, Corporate Parent Fujikura Ltd., Corporate Parent NTT Advanced Technology Corporation for US Conec, LTD.. (Bradley, Kirk)
April 8, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Michael Turk on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Turk, Matthew)
April 8, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by M. Joseph Fernando on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Fernando, M. Joseph)
April 8, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Scott Stevens on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Stevens, Matthew)
April 8, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joshua Mark Weeks on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Weeks, Joshua)
April 8, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael J Newton on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Newton, Michael)
April 8, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kirk T Bradley on behalf of US Conec, LTD. (Bradley, Kirk)
March 21, 2024 Filing 3 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Complaint,,. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C-1, #2 Exhibit C-2, #3 Exhibit E-1, #4 Exhibit F-1)(Newton, Michael)
March 21, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
March 21, 2024 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
March 20, 2024 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Newton, Michael)
March 20, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10041586.), filed by US Conec, LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit B-1, #5 Exhibit B-2, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit D-1, #9 Exhibit E, #10 Exhibit F, #11 Exhibit G, #12 Exhibit H, #13 Exhibit I, #14 Exhibit J, #15 Exhibit K, #16 Exhibit L, #17 Exhibit M, #18 Exhibit N, #19 Exhibit O, #20 Civil Cover Sheet)(Newton, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: US Conec, LTD. v. Senko Advance Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: US Conec, LTD.
Represented By: Michael J Newton
Represented By: Kirk T Bradley
Represented By: Joshua Mark Weeks
Represented By: M. Joseph Fernando
Represented By: Matthew Scott Stevens
Represented By: Matthew Michael Turk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Senko Advance Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EZconn Corp.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flexoptix GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Changzhou Co-Net Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shenzhen UnitekFiber Solution Ltd.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shenzhen IH Optics Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rayoptic Communication Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HuNan Surfiber Technology Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Kevin Robinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?