Innovations In Memory LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation
| Innovations In Memory LLC |
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| 2:2024cv00296 |
| May 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00360. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial., Cases associated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/27/2024. (NKL)
|
| Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re International Business Machines Corporation.(Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth Raymond Hasenour on behalf of Innovations In Memory LLC (Hasenour, Seth) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Randy Yim on behalf of Innovations In Memory LLC (Yim, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Drew Bennett Hollander on behalf of Innovations In Memory LLC (Hollander, Drew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Scott Edward Kolassa on behalf of Innovations In Memory LLC (Kolassa, Scott) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Francis Petrsoric on behalf of Innovations In Memory LLC (Petrsoric, John) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for International Business Machines Corporation to 7/7/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innovations In Memory LLC. International Business Machines Corporation served on 5/2/2024. (Cooper, Brett) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to International Business Machines Corporation. (NKL) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Innovations In Memory LLC (Cooper, Brett) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Cooper, Brett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against International Business Machines Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10115318.), filed by Innovations In Memory LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cooper, Brett) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (CH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
