Motedata Inc. v. Track What Matters, L.L.C.
| Motedata Inc. |
| Track What Matters, L.L.C. |
| 2:2024cv00369 |
| May 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Edward Chin on behalf of Motedata Inc. (Chin, Edward) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew J Wright on behalf of Motedata Inc. (Wright, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Anthony Kyle Bruster on behalf of Motedata Inc. (Bruster, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Shawn A. Latchford on behalf of Motedata Inc. (Latchford, Shawn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shawn A. Latchford on behalf of Motedata Inc. (Latchford, Shawn) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Latchford, Shawn) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Motedata Inc. (Latchford, Shawn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Track What Matters, L.L.C. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10145259.), filed by Motedata Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - US7956742, #2 Exhibit 2 - US8314705, #3 Exhibit 3 - US8952814, #4 Exhibit 4 - US9218520, #5 Exhibit 5 - US9817870, #6 Exhibit 6 - US10459930, #7 Exhibit 7 - 11100118, #8 Exhibit 8 - 742 Claim Chart, #9 Exhibit 9 - 705 Claim Chart, #10 Exhibit 10 - 814 Claim Chart, #11 Exhibit 11 - 520 Claim Chart, #12 Exhibit 12 - 870 Claim Chart, #13 Exhibit 13 - 930 Claim Chart, #14 Exhibit 14 - 118 Claim Chart, #15 Exhibit 15 - Gonsalves Declaration, #16 Civil Cover Sheet)(Latchford, Shawn) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (CH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Motedata Inc. v. Track What Matters, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Motedata Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Shawn A. Latchford |
| Represented By: | Anthony Kyle Bruster |
| Represented By: | Edward Chin |
| Represented By: | Andrew J Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Track What Matters, L.L.C. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
