Infogation Corporation v. MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Infogation Corporation
Defendant: MiTAC International Corporation, MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation and MiTAC Holdings Corporation
Case Number: 2:2024cv00536
Filed: July 12, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Infogation Corporation. MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation served on 7/26/2024; MiTAC Holdings Corporation served on 7/26/2024; MiTAC International Corporation served on 7/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Garteiser, Randall)
July 23, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation, MiTAC Holdings Corporation, MiTAC International Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s))(NKL)
July 15, 2024 Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL)
July 15, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
July 12, 2024 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Honea, Christopher)
July 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation, MiTAC Holdings Corporation, MiTAC International Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10236835.), filed by Infogation Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Honea, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Infogation Corporation v. MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MiTAC International Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MiTAC Holdings Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Infogation Corporation
Represented By: Christopher A Honea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?