Pace v. Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft Corporation et al
| Glen Pace |
| Hartzell Engine Technologies, LLC, Continental Aerospace Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Continental Motor Corporation, Don George, LLC d/b/a Don George Aircraft, Apteryx, Inc. d/b/a Arapahoe Aero Aircraft Sales, LLC, Special Services Corporation, Amsafe, Inc., Smiller, Inc. d/b/a Fixed Wing Aviation Maintenance and Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft Corporation |
| 2:2024cv00539 |
| July 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Wayne E Ferrell, Jr on behalf of Glen Pace. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10339828. (Ferrell, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 6
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Don George, LLC d/b/a Don George Aircraft.(Klein, Steven)
|
|
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Don George, LLC d/b/a Don George Aircraft to 10/23/2024. 40 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH)
|
|
Filing 5
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft Corporation.(Tully, Kevin)
|
|
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft Corporation to 10/3/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued as to Amsafe, Inc., Apteryx, Inc. d/b/a Arapahoe Aero Aircraft Sales, LLC, Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft Corporation, Continental Aerospace Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Continental Motor Corporation, Don George, LLC d/b/a Don George Aircraft, Hartzell Engine Technologies, LLC, Smiller, Inc. d/b/a Fixed Wing Aviation Maintenance, Special Services Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s), #3 Additional Attachment(s), #4 Additional Attachment(s), #5 Additional Attachment(s), #6 Additional Attachment(s), #7 Additional Attachment(s))(NKL)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mary Abbott Martin on behalf of Glen Pace (Martin, Mary)
|
|
Filing 2
FILED IN ERROR NOTICE of filing Civil Cover Sheet by Glen Pace re #1 Complaint (Peckham, Charles) Modified on 7/17/2024 (NKL).
|
|
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL)
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10242036.), filed by Glen Pace.(Peckham, Charles) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2024: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (NKL).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
