AGIS Software Development LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
AGIS Software Development LLC |
Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
2:2024cv00601 |
July 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (CH) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (CH) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Enrique William Iturralde on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Iturralde, Enrique) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by AGIS Software Development LLC identifying Corporate Parent AGIS Holdings, Inc. for AGIS Software Development LLC. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Motorola Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10267313.), filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 9,445,251, #3 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. 9,467,838, #4 Exhibit D - U.S. Patent No. 9,820,123, #5 Exhibit E - U.S. Patent No. 9,749,829, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fabricant, Alfred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AGIS Software Development LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AGIS Software Development LLC | |
Represented By: | Alfred Ross Fabricant |
Represented By: | Vincent J Rubino, III |
Represented By: | Peter Lambrianakos |
Represented By: | Enrique William Iturralde |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Motorola Solutions, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.