Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. PowerFleet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant: PowerFleet, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv00718
Filed: August 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Philip Gregory Brown on behalf of PowerFleet, Inc. (Brown, Philip)
October 24, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexander Hale Martin on behalf of PowerFleet, Inc. (Martin, Alexander)
October 24, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael R Ellis on behalf of PowerFleet, Inc. (Ellis, Michael)
October 24, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lance Eric Wyatt, Jr on behalf of PowerFleet, Inc. (Wyatt, Lance)
October 23, 2024 Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Amend/Correct #10 Order Setting Hearing/Deadline To Extend The Time To Serve Preliminary Infringement Contentions And Preliminary Invalidity Contentions by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McDonough, James)
October 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 11/7/2024 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/21/24. (bga)
October 17, 2024 Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re PowerFleet, Inc..(McNabnay, Neil)
October 17, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for PowerFleet, Inc. to 11/8/2024. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL)
September 12, 2024 Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re PowerFleet, Inc..(McNabnay, Neil)
September 12, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for PowerFleet, Inc. to 10/24/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL)
September 6, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. PowerFleet, Inc. served on 9/3/2024. (McDonough, James)
September 3, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to PowerFleet, Inc.. (CH)
September 3, 2024 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (CH)
September 3, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH)
August 30, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carey Matthew Rozier on behalf of Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Rozier, Carey)
August 30, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Lloyd Hardt on behalf of Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Hardt, Jonathan)
August 30, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (McDonough, James)
August 30, 2024 Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (McDonough, James)
August 30, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against PowerFleet, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10331453.), filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 6,429,810, #2 Exhibit B. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,058,040, #3 Exhibit C. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,260,153, #4 Exhibit D. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,599,715, #5 Exhibit E. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,656,845, #6 Exhibit F. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,742,388, #7 Exhibit G. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,747,291, #8 Exhibit H. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 7,783,304, #9 Exhibit I. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 8,005,053, #10 Exhibit J. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 8,494,581, #11 Exhibit K. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 9,299,044, #12 Exhibit L. Claim Chart for U.S. Patent 9,747,565, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Additional Attachment(s) Proposed Summons)(McDonough, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. PowerFleet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PowerFleet, Inc.
Represented By: Philip Gregory Brown
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: Michael R Ellis
Represented By: Lance Eric Wyatt, Jr
Represented By: Alexander Hale Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Represented By: James Francis McDonough, III
Represented By: Jonathan Lloyd Hardt
Represented By: Carey Matthew Rozier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?