Brook + Whittle LTD v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Brook + Whittle LTD
Defendant: Nestle USA, Inc. and Fuji Seal International, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv00735
Filed: September 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Brook + Whittle LTD (Fair, Andrea)
September 9, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Fuji Seal International, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s))(CH)
September 9, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH)
September 9, 2024 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (CH)
September 8, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Brown, Brandon)
September 8, 2024 Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Brook + Whittle LTD identifying Corporate Parent Genstar Capital LLC for Brook + Whittle LTD. (Brown, Brandon)
September 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10344723.), filed by Brook + Whittle LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent 11,961,422, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart, #3 Exhibit C - Nesquik Webpage, #4 Exhibit D - Where to Buy, #5 Exhibit E - Nesquik Walmart Webpage, #6 Exhibit F - Nestle Locations, #7 Exhibit G - Fuji Seal Locations, #8 Exhibit H - Nesquik Recycling Press Release, #9 Exhibit I - Article on Nestle's Use of Recyclable Light-Blocking Shrink Sleeves, #10 Exhibit J - Nesquik Youtube Video Link, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Brandon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brook + Whittle LTD v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nestle USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fuji Seal International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brook + Whittle LTD
Represented By: Brandon H Brown
Represented By: Andrea Leigh Fair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?