Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv00964
Filed: November 21, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (30 days requested for both Defendants; up to and including February 17, 2025) Murata Electronics North America, Inc. answer due 2/17/2025; Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. answer due 2/17/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/8/2025. (NKL)
January 7, 2025 Filing 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (30 days requested for both Defendants; up to and including February 17, 2025) by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McDonough, James)
December 12, 2024 Filing 11 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. answer is now due 1/16/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL)
December 12, 2024 Filing 10 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Murata Electronics North America, Inc. answer is now due 1/16/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL)
December 12, 2024 Filing 9 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time for Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. to Answer Complaint filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. Summons originally served on 12/16/2024. Agreed new answer date is 1/16/2025.(McDonough, James)
December 12, 2024 Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time for Murata Electronics North America, Inc. to Answer Complaint filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. Summons originally served on 12/17/2024. Agreed new answer date is 1/16/2025.(McDonough, James)
December 3, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. All Defendants. (McDonough, James)
November 22, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Murata Electronics North America, Inc., Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s))(KLC)
November 22, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (KLC)
November 22, 2024 District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne added. (KLC)
November 21, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Francis McDonough, III on behalf of Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (McDonough, James)
November 21, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Lloyd Hardt on behalf of Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Hardt, Jonathan)
November 21, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rozier, Carey)
November 21, 2024 Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Rozier, Carey)
November 21, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10510655.), filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Evidence of Use Chart US 6,549,583, #2 Exhibit B. Evidence of Use Chart US 6,633,616, #3 Exhibit C. Evidence of Use Chart US 7,058,040, #4 Exhibit D. Evidence of Use Chart US 7,260,153, #5 Exhibit E. Evidence of Use Chart US 7,656,845, #6 Exhibit F. Evidence of Use Chart US 7,742,388, #7 Exhibit G. Evidence of Use Chart US 8,005,053, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Additional Attachment(s) Proposed Summons: (1) Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., #10 Additional Attachment(s) Proposed Summons: (2) Murata Electronics North America, Inc.)(Rozier, Carey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murata Electronics North America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Represented By: Carey Matthew Rozier
Represented By: Jonathan Lloyd Hardt
Represented By: James Francis McDonough, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?