Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
| Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC |
| Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00981 |
| November 27, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. answer is now due 3/10/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. Summons originally served on 1/03/2025. Agreed new answer date is 3/10/2025.(Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. served on 1/3/2025. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Company. (NKL) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10522322.), filed by Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garteiser, Randall) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Hugh Findlay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Randall T Garteiser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.