A.F., on behalf of J.F. et al v. CHARACTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
| A.F., on behalf of J.F. and A.R., on behalf of B.R. |
| Alphabet Inc., NOAM SHAZEER, DANIEL DE FREITAS ADIWARSANA, CHARACTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Google LLC |
| 2:2024cv01014 |
| December 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Meetali Jain on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10637941. (Jain, Meetali) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael E Jones on behalf of Google LLC, Alphabet Inc. (Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Google LLC answer is now due 3/10/2025; Alphabet Inc. answer is now due 3/10/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Google LLC, Alphabet Inc.. Summons originally served on 01/06/2025. Agreed new answer date is 03/10/2025.(Hassett, Shaun) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. CHARACTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. answer is now due 3/10/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by CHARACTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. Summons originally served on 1/7/2025. Agreed new answer date is 3/10/2025.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Laura Marquez-Garrett on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10564796. (Marquez-Garrett, Laura) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Glenn Draper on behalf of A.F., on behalf of J.F., A.R., on behalf of B.R.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10564780. (Draper, Glenn) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants and emailed back to Attorney for service. (ljw) |
| Filing 3 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Complaint,,. Caption Corrected. (Bergman, Matthew) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Matthew P Bergman on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10542376. (Bergman, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR STRICT LIABILITY, NEGLIGENCE, VIOLATIONS OF TEXAS DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. 17.46, ET SEQ., AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10542367.), filed by A.F., on behalf of J.F., A.R., on behalf of B.R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(Bergman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.