Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Cobra Trading, Inc.
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| Cobra Trading, Inc. |
| 2:2025cv00223 |
| February 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CONSOLIDATION ORDER- The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:25-cv-00232. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 04/06/2025. (KLC)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Cobra Trading, Inc. answer is now due 5/5/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(KLC) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Cobra Trading, Inc.. Summons originally served on February 28, 2025. Agreed new answer date is May 5, 2025.(Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Sean Yungwirth on behalf of Cobra Trading, Inc. (Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Cobra Trading, Inc.. (NKL) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Phillip Rabicoff on behalf of Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Cobra Trading, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10686002.), filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Cobra Trading, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Phillip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cobra Trading, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Sean Yungwirth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
