Media Key LLC v. RugGear GmbH
| Media Key LLC |
| RugGear GmbH |
| 2:2025cv00268 |
| March 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (NKL) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/11/2025. (NKL)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Media Key LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. RugGear GmbH answer is now due 5/24/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(ljw) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by RugGear GmbH. Summons originally served on 04/03/2025. Agreed new answer date is 05/24/2025.(Wang, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy Tiewei Wang on behalf of RugGear GmbH (Wang, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to RugGear GmbH. (KLC) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Media Key LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Phillip Rabicoff on behalf of Media Key LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against RugGear GmbH ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10711426.), filed by Media Key LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Media Key LLC v. RugGear GmbH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Media Key LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Phillip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RugGear GmbH | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Tiewei Wang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
