Credo Semiconductor Inc. et al v. Amphenol Corporation
| Credo Semiconductor Inc. and Credo Technology Group Ltd. |
| Amphenol Corporation |
| 2:2025cv00296 |
| March 13, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (NKL) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/21/2025. (NKL)
|
| Filing 16 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) by Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 04/20/2025. (mdj)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Amphenol Corporation answer is now due 5/16/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(KLC) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Amphenol Corporation. Summons originally served on 3/26/2025. Agreed new answer date is 5/16/2025.(Garten, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay Pending Final Disposition of a Related Proceeding Before the United States International Trade Commission by Amphenol Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Garten, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Amphenol Corporation (Garten, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd.. Amphenol Corporation served on 3/26/2025. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Amphenol Corporation, filed by Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Amphenol Corporation. (KLC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brian Livedalen on behalf of Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd. (Livedalen, Brian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ruffin B Cordell on behalf of Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd. (Cordell, Ruffin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard Alex Sterba on behalf of Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd. (Sterba, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd., Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc. for Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd.. (Sterba, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Sterba, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Amphenol Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10724055.), filed by Credo Semiconductor Inc., Credo Technology Group Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sterba, Richard) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (KLC) |
| District Judge Rodney Gilstrap added. (KLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
