Context Directions LLC v. Peters Chevrolet, Inc.
| Context Directions LLC |
| Peters Chevrolet, Inc. |
| 2:2025cv00626 |
| June 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
CONSOLIDATION ORDER- The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:25-cv-00953. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/28/2025. (mdj)
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) (NKL) |
| Filing 14 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, by Peters Chevrolet, Inc..(Drake, Kirby) |
| Filing 13 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Peters Chevrolet, Inc. (Drake, Kirby) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Peters Chevrolet, Inc. answer due 10/27/2025. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/26/2025. (NKL)
|
| Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Context Directions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bennett, David) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Peters Chevrolet, Inc. answer is now due 9/25/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Context Directions LLC on behalf of Peters Chevrolet, Inc. Summons originally served on 7/21/2025. Agreed new answer date is 9/25/2025.(Bennett, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Context Directions LLC re #7 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief of Alternate Service on Defendant Peters Chevrolet, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Proof of Service)(Kalberg, Steven) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Substitute Service. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/17/2025. (NKL)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Substitute Service re #4 Summons Issued of Defendant Peters Chevrolet, Inc. by Context Directions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Proof of Nonservice, #2 Proposed Order)(Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David R Bennett on behalf of Context Directions LLC (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Peters Chevrolet, Inc.. (NKL) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Context Directions LLC (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Peters Chevrolet, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10898663.), filed by Context Directions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A United States Patent No. 9,807,564, #2 Exhibit B United States Patent No. 9,807,564 v. Ford Vehicles, #3 Exhibit C United States Patent No. 9,807,564 v. Toyota Vehicles, #4 Exhibit D United States Patent No. 10,142,791, #5 Exhibit E United States Patent No. 10,142,791 v. Ford Vehicles, #6 Exhibit F United States Patent No. 10,142,791 v. Toyota Vehicles, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kalberg, Steven) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Context Directions LLC v. Peters Chevrolet, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Context Directions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven Kalberg |
| Represented By: | David R Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Peters Chevrolet, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kirby Blair Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
