DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Resideo Technologies, Inc. et al
| DigiMedia Tech, LLC |
| Resideo Technologies, Inc. and Resideo LLC |
| 2:2025cv00731 |
| July 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Roy S Payne |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at Termination of the case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mdj) |
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/08/2025. (mdj)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DigiMedia Tech, LLC (Alexander, Cortney) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Stay of all unreached deadlines in this case is extended to December 1, 2025, at which time the Parties shall submit the proper dismissal papers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/27/2025. (mdj)
|
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Cortney) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay all Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 09/26/2025. (mdj)
|
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Resideo LLC answer is now due 9/26/2025; Resideo Technologies, Inc. answer is now due 9/26/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(KLC) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. Summons originally served on 7/22/2025. Agreed new answer date is 9/26/2025.(Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Resideo LLC, Resideo Technologies, Inc.. (mdj) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Resideo LLC, Resideo Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10971142.), filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 6,741,250, #2 Exhibit B - PTO Presentation, #3 Exhibit C - USP 6,473,532, #4 Exhibit D - Claim Chart for USP 6,741,250, #5 Exhibit E - Claim Chart for USP 6,473,532, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, Cortney) |
| District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne added. (mdj) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
