Integral Wireless Technologies LLC v. Teltonika IoT Group
| Integral Wireless Technologies LLC |
| Teltonika IoT Group and Teltonika Networks, UAB |
| 2:2025cv00945 |
| September 10, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement against Teltonika IoT Group, Teltonika Networks, UAB, filed by Integral Wireless Technologies LLC.(Rozier, Carey) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Integral Wireless Technologies LLC (Rozier, Carey) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(2) and 12(B)(6) by Teltonika IoT Group. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit/Declaration V. Chocha, #2 Proposed Order)(Tamkin, Gregory) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Teltonika IoT Group answer due 2/20/2026. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 02/14/2026. (mdj)
|
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Teltonika IoT Group. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tamkin, Gregory) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 7, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. PLEASE IGNORE.*** Motion #7 was incorrectly filed by counsel for defendant. Answer date has not been extended at this time. Emails and voicemails have been left for defendant's counsel advising that applications for extension of time must be filed correctly if extension is still needed. (mdj) |
| Filing 8 Summons returned executed by Integral Wireless Technologies LLC. Teltonika IoT Group served on 12/31/2025. (McDonough, James) |
| Filing 7 FILED IN ERROR AS A MOTION.-UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Teltonika IoT Group. (Tamkin, Gregory) Modified on 1/20/2026 (mdj). Please note extension of time must be filed using the event unopposed application for extension of time. Modified on 2/11/2026 (mdj). |
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to Teltonika IoT Group. (NKL) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mdj) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (mdj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carey Matthew Rozier on behalf of Integral Wireless Technologies LLC (Rozier, Carey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Lloyd Hardt on behalf of Integral Wireless Technologies LLC (Hardt, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (McDonough, James) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Integral Wireless Technologies LLC (McDonough, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Teltonika IoT Group ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11084386.), filed by Integral Wireless Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Proposed Summons)(McDonough, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
