Quantion LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.
| Quantion LLC |
| ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. |
| 2:2025cv01014 |
| October 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (NKL) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/18/2026. (NKL)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Quantion LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 3/26/2026 at 09:30 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/19/2026. (NKL)
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Quantion LLC. ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. waiver sent on 12/17/2025, answer due 3/17/2026. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.. (NKL) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Quantion LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Phillip Rabicoff on behalf of Quantion LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Complaint. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11133662.), filed by Quantion LLC.(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) (NKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quantion LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quantion LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Phillip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
