HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v. Nokia of America Corporation et al
| HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD |
| Nokia of America Corporation and Nokia Corporation |
| 2:2025cv01091 |
| October 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at Termination of the case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mdj) |
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/31/2025. (mdj)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (Davis, Keith) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER ( Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2026 at 09:30 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/16/2025. (mdj)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Nokia Corporation answer due 2/9/2026; Nokia of America Corporation answer due 2/9/2026. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/04/2025. (mdj)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Christopher James Gass on behalf of HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-11228850. (Gass, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Nokia Corporation, Nokia of America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
| Filing 6 Summons returned executed by HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. Nokia of America Corporation served on 11/3/2025. (Davis, Keith) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Nokia Corporation, Nokia of America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s))(mdj) |
| Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (Davis, Keith) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Davis, Keith) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Davis, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Nokia Corporation, Nokia of America Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11178583.), filed by HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 10,116,602, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 10,574,570, #3 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. 10,382,371, #4 Exhibit D - U.S. Patent No. 10,044,649, #5 Exhibit E - U.S. Patent No. 10,601,744, #6 Exhibit F - U.S. Patent No. 8,848,885, #7 Exhibit G - U.S. Patent No. 10,121,516, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Keith) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (mdj) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) (mdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
