Sulaco Enterprises LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
| Sulaco Enterprises LLC |
| Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. |
| 2:2025cv01192 |
| December 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (NKL) |
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE (Motion(s) #9 terminated). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/4/2026. (NKL)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sulaco Enterprises LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory on Defendant Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. by Sulaco Enterprises LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Request for Service Abroad of Judicial or Extrajudicial Documents, #2 Proposed Order)(Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 8 Summons issued as to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.. (NKL) |
| Case: Sulaco Enterprises LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. was filed on 12/8/2025 and assigned to Judge Gilstrap and referred to Judge. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (NKL) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of Sulaco Enterprises LLC (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of Sulaco Enterprises LLC (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of Sulaco Enterprises LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue SUMMONS filed by Sulaco Enterprises LLC. (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Sulaco Enterprises LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11243416.), filed by Sulaco Enterprises LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rubino, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sulaco Enterprises LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sulaco Enterprises LLC | |
| Represented By: | Vincent J Rubino, III |
| Represented By: | Peter Lambrianakos |
| Represented By: | Alfred Ross Fabricant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.