Interactive Content Engines, LLC v. Eros International Media Ltd.
| Interactive Content Engines, LLC |
| Eros International Media Ltd. |
| 2:2026cv00036 |
| January 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (NKL) |
Filing 17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Motion(s) #16 terminated). Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 6/16/2026. (NKL)
|
| Filing 16 JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Eros International Media Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Joint Motion to Stay all Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. All deadlines in this cause are STAYED for a period of 30 days. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 5/12/26. (ljw)
|
| Filing 14 JOINT SEALED ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to Main Document: #13 JOINT MOTION to Stay ALL DEADLINES AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 13 JOINT MOTION to Stay ALL DEADLINES AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Eros International Media Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 12 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Eros International Media Ltd. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Eros International Media Ltd.. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Eros International Media Ltd..(Smith, Melissa) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) (NKL) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 04/29/2026. (KLC)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, Eros International Media Ltd. answer due 5/1/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/29/2026. (NKL)
|
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT by Eros International Media Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Eros International Media Ltd. answer is now due 4/27/2026. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Eros International Media Ltd.. Summons originally served on 2/20/2026. Agreed new answer date is 4/27/2026.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 4 Summons returned executed by Interactive Content Engines, LLC. Eros International Media Ltd. served on 2/20/2026. (Fuller, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Eros International Media Ltd. c/o Eros International USA c/o The Corporation Trust Company Corporation Trust Center. (NKL) |
| Case: Interactive Content Engines, LLC v. Eros International Media Ltd. was filed on 1/20/2026 and assigned to Judge Schroeder and referred to Judge Payne. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (NKL) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fuller, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eros International Media Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11315723.), filed by Interactive Content Engines, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Claim Chart, #3 Exhibit B - Claim Chart) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Fuller, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Interactive Content Engines, LLC v. Eros International Media Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Interactive Content Engines, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael Scott Fuller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eros International Media Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Richards Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
