Ax Wireless, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc et al
Plaintiff: Ax Wireless, LLC
Defendant: ASUSTeK Computer Inc and Asus Computer International, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2026cv00086
Filed: February 2, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay Pending Related Proceeding Before the ITC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/17/2026. (NKL)
March 16, 2026 Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay by ASUSTeK Computer Inc, Asus Computer International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Colaianni, Joseph)
March 16, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph V Colaianni, Jr on behalf of ASUSTeK Computer Inc, Asus Computer International, Inc. (Colaianni, Joseph)
February 6, 2026 Filing 5 Summons returned executed by Ax Wireless, LLC. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Jacobson, Lowell)
February 4, 2026 Filing 4 Summons issued as to ASUSTeK Computer Inc, Asus Computer International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s))(NKL)
February 3, 2026 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL)
February 3, 2026 Case: Ax Wireless, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc et al was filed on 2/3/2026 and assigned to Judge Gilstrap and referred to Judge Payne. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (NKL)
February 2, 2026 Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Ax Wireless, LLC (Henson, Clifford)
February 2, 2026 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Henson, Clifford)
February 2, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11344844.), filed by Ax Wireless, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Henson, Clifford)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ax Wireless, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ax Wireless, LLC
Represented By: Clifford Chad Henson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASUSTeK Computer Inc
Represented By: Joseph V Colaianni, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Asus Computer International, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph V Colaianni, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?