Activemap LLC v. Lucky OpCo LLC
Plaintiff: Activemap LLC
Defendant: Lucky OpCo LLC
Case Number: 2:2026cv00161
Filed: February 27, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2026 Filing 12 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at Termination of the case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mdj)
June 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 06/05/2026. (mdj)
June 4, 2026 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Activemap LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Honea, Christopher)
May 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay all Deadlines. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 05/12/2026. (KLC)
May 8, 2026 Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and NOTICE of Resolution by Activemap LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Honea, Christopher)
April 30, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 04/29/2026. (KLC)
March 16, 2026 Filing 6 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Lucky OpCo LLC answer is now due 5/10/2026. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL)
March 16, 2026 Filing 5 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Lucky OpCo LLC. Summons originally served on 03/05/2026. Agreed new answer date is 05/10/2026.(Greeson, Robert)
March 6, 2026 Filing 4 Summons returned executed by Activemap LLC. Lucky OpCo LLC served on 3/5/2026. (Garteiser, Randall)
March 3, 2026 Filing 3 Summons issued as to Lucky OpCo LLC. (mdj)
March 2, 2026 District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne added. (KLC)
March 2, 2026 Case: Activemap LLC v. Lucky OpCo LLC was filed on 03/02/2026 and assigned to Judge Schroeder and referred to Judge Payne. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (KLC)
February 27, 2026 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Honea, Christopher)
February 27, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lucky OpCo LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11396428.), filed by Activemap LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Honea, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Activemap LLC v. Lucky OpCo LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Activemap LLC
Represented By: Christopher A Honea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lucky OpCo LLC
Represented By: Robert L Greeson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?