Figueroa v. Rumi Transport LLC et al
| Gilberto Figueroa |
| Rumi Transport LLC, Ahmad Bagrami and David Grant Cook |
| 2:2026cv00375 |
| May 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Linda Le on behalf of Gilberto Figueroa (Le, Linda) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Ahmad Bagrami, David Grant Cook, Rumi Transport LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mdj) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons to David Grant Cook filed by Gilberto Figueroa. (Clark, Collen) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons to Ahmad Shoib Bagrami filed by Gilberto Figueroa. (Clark, Collen) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Gilberto Figueroa. (Clark, Collen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ahmad Bagrami, David Grant Cook, Rumi Transport LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11525274.), filed by Gilberto Figueroa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clark, Collen) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (mdj) |
| Case: Figueroa v. Rumi Transport LLC et al was filed on 05/06/2026 and assigned to Judge Gilstrap. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (mdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.