Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al
| Touchstream Technologies, Inc. |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and HARMAN International Industries, Inc. |
| 2:2026cv00515 |
| June 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (Dykal, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Dykal, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11629335.), filed by Touchstream Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - 251 Patent, #3 Exhibit B - 751 Patent, #4 Exhibit C - 289 Patent, #5 Exhibit D - 062 Patent) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Dykal, Ryan) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (mdj) |
| Case: Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al was filed on 06/26/2026 and assigned to Judge Gilstrap. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (mdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
