Breckenridge et al v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company
| John Breckenridge and Janet Breckenridge |
| Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company |
| 2:2026cv00516 |
| June 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) AND (2) Disclosure Statement filed by Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Travelers Companies, Inc. for Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company. (Kao, Sheryl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company from 115th Marion County District Court, case number 2600048. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11629338), filed by Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Supp/Removal case, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F)(Kao, Sheryl) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL) |
| Case: Breckenridge et al v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company was filed on 6/26/2026 and assigned to Judge Gilstrap. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (NKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.