QuanteFi Corporation v. Commscope Holding Company, Inc., et al
| QuanteFi Corporation |
| Commscope Holding Company, Inc.,, Commscope Inc.,, Vistance Networks, Inc. and Vistance Networks Holdings, LLC |
| 2:2026cv00735 |
| August 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Vistance Networks Holdings, LLC answer is now due 11/9/2026; Commscope Holding Company, Inc., answer is now due 11/9/2026; Commscope Inc., answer is now due 11/9/2026; Vistance Networks, Inc. answer is now due 11/9/2026. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(ndc) |
| Filing 14 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Commscope Inc.,, Commscope Holding Company, Inc.,, Vistance Networks Holdings, LLC, Vistance Networks, Inc.. Agreed new answer date is November 7, 2026.(Barton, Ross) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Ali-Reza Boloori on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-11790764. (Boloori, Ali-Reza) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexandra Figari Easley on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Easley, Alexandra) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam S Hoffman on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Hoffman, Adam) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew D Weiss on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Weiss, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian W Conkle on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Conkle, Christian) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Linjun Xu on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Xu, Linjun) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Anthony Kroeger on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Kroeger, Paul) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Reza Mirzaie on behalf of QuanteFi Corporation (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 5 Summons returned executed by QuanteFi Corporation. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) POS for CommScope Holding Company, #2 Additional Attachment(s) POS for Vistance Networks Holdings, LLC, #3 Additional Attachment(s) POS for Vistance Networks Inc.)(Fenster, Marc) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Commscope Holding Company, Inc.,, Commscope Inc.,, Vistance Networks Holdings, LLC, Vistance Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(mdj) |
| Case: QuanteFi Corporation v. Commscope Holding Company, Inc., et al was filed on 08/24/2026 and assigned to Judge Gilstrap and referred to Judge Payne. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (mdj) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (mdj) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by QuanteFi Corporation (Fenster, Marc) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fenster, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11749420.), filed by QuanteFi Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Fenster, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
