LaDue v. LaFrance Corporation
Case Number: 4:2006cv00350
Filed: August 25, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
Presiding Judge: Richard A. Schell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting in part 38 MOTION to Modify Temporary Restraining Order filed by Robert C LaDue, and granting in part, only with respect to the requested attys' fees and expert's fees and costs 41 Motion for Contempt against Pltf- counterclaim Dft filed by LaFrance Corporation, and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Special Master. LaFrance shall provide to the court by Tuesday, 9/12/06 an itemization of its attys' fees and costs which were expended in the prosecution of its motion for contempt and the fees and costs charged to LaFrance by its computer expert for this attendance at the office of LaFrance's counsel on 9/1/06. LaDue shall have until Tuesday, 9/19/06 to file his response. Thereafter the court wil detemine the appropriate dollar amount that LaDue must pay to reimburse LaFrance. Homer B Reynolds, III rep by Homer Baskin Reynolds, III appointed.. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/5/06. (ttm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaDue v. LaFrance Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?