Quinn v. Guerrero et al
| John Gerard Quinn |
| Jesus Damian Guerrero, Vincent Roberts, Aaron Howell, Aaron Smith, Barry Eaves, Donnie Williams, Drew Caudell, Jason Norton, Jesse Garcia, Ting Sun, Joel Purser and City of McKinney, Texas |
| 4:2009cv00166 |
| April 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Collin |
| Don D. Bush |
| Richard A. Schell |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION for, 106 Report and Recommendation, 107 Report and Recommendation, 75 Motion to Dismiss filed by Aaron Smith , Donnie Williams, Joel Purser, Jason Norton, Jesus Damian Guerrero, 91 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Aaron Smith, Donnie Williams, Joel Purser, Jason Norton, City of McKinney, Texas, Rex Redden, Jesus Damian Guerrero, 110 Motion for Reconsideration filed by John Gerard Quinn, 74 Motion to Dismiss filed by City of McKinney, Texas, 79 Motion to Dismiss filed by Aaron Smith, Donnie Williams, Joel Purser, Jason Norton, Rex Redden, Jesus Damian Guerrero. As to Plainti ff's motion for reconsideration, it (Dkt. 110) is DENIED. Defendants Jesus Damian Guerrero, Rex Redden, Jason Norton, Donnie Williams, Aaron Smith, Joel Purser, and Doe Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Individual Defendants Based on the Statute of Limitations (Dkt. 75) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Jesus Damian Guerrero, Rex Redden, Aaron Smith, Donnie Williams, Jason Norton, Joel Purser and Doe Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Based on Res Judicata (Dkt. 79) and Motion to Dismiss Based on Heck v. Humphrey and Qualified Immunity (Dkt. 91) as to those officer defendants are DENIED as MOOT. Further, Defendant City of McKinney, Texas' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims (Dkt. 74) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against the City of McKinney are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 8/26/2016. (kls, )
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER LIFTING STAY for 70 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 4/11/14. (cm, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 38 re: Denying 30 Motion to Dismiss, DENYING 27 Motion to Dismiss, DENYING 29 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, GRANTING in part 18 Motion to Quash and Stay Case. "...this matter shall be STAYED in its entirety until the criminal proceedings against Plaintiff are completed." Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 2/22/10. (cm, )
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REGARDING STAY OF CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF RELATED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. "Within fourteen (14) days after service of the magistrate judges report, any party may serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(c)." Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 1/28/10. (cm, )
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 13 Report and Recommendations, 6 Motion to Remand filed by John Gerard Quinn. "Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Dkt.6) is DENIED." Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 12/21/09. (cm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
