United States of America v. Renda et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Oscar Renda, Rudolph J. Renda, Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc. and Renda Environmental, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00368
Filed: July 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Presiding Judge: Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 101 Report and Recommendations,,, 77 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by United States of America, 80 Motion for Reconsideration, filed by Oscar Renda, Rudolph J. Renda, Renda Environmental, Inc., Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc., 78 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Oscar Renda, Rudolph J. Renda, Renda Environmental, Inc., Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc.. Plaintiff United States of Americas Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 77) is GRANTED, D efendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 78) is DENIED, and Defendants Amended Motion to Reconsider and/or Modify Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation of the United Sates Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 80) is DENIED. Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit a proposed final judgment for the Courts consideration. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/23/11. (cm, ) Modified on 9/26/2011 (cm, ).
September 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 31 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by United States of America, 54 Report and Recommendations. The United States Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims and to Strike Affirmative Defenses (Dkt. 31) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/23/10. (cm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Renda et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: John Robert Kresse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oscar Renda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rudolph J. Renda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Renda Environmental, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?