Clauer et al v. Heritage Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
| Michael Clauer and Maflorence Clauer |
| Heritage Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc., Mark C. DiSanti, Steeplechase Productions, LLC and Jad I. Aboul-Jibin |
| 4:2009cv00560 |
| November 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 66 Report and Recommendations, 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by Vinay B. Patel. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 6/30/10. (cm, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 62 Report and Recommendations, 45 Motion to Dismiss filed by Heritage Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc.. Defendant Heritage Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc.sRule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. #45) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 6/16/10. (cm, )
|
|
Filing
30
Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for 23 Report and Recommendations, 13 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Maflorence Clauer, Michael Clauer. "It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Dkt. #13) is DENIED." Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 2/2/10. (cm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
